Advertiser












   




Viewpoint: Commitment Time An open letter to governer candidate Ted Kulongoski.
Viewpoint : Deadly Arrogance 9/11 and the conscience of America.
Viewpoint : Stalk Shows Limbaugh imitators serve ideologues.
Letters: EW readers sound off.

 



Commitment Time
An open letter to governer candidate Ted Kulongoski.

While I appreciate the enormity of running for governor in Oregon and the challenge of bringing home the vote from a diverse population of people and views, I do want to share with you some thoughts as you move into the final months of the campaign.

Those of us who are concerned about the future of education in Oregon are really waiting to hear you demand that Oregon must and can do better. We want to hear that you recognize Oregon's funding of education, from pre-kindergarten through higher education, is woefully inadequate. The message our current level of funding gives to our children is unforgivable, and the message it gives economic investors is perilous for our state. Our children have to believe they do not rank very high in our state priorities. And who would locate their business in a state that has been busy disassembling its education system for a decade with no end in sight?

I have read that you caution schools have to make the case to the voters that they have been spending tax dollars responsibly before schools can ask for more revenue to be invested in our children. Ted, I believe the case has been made over and over again for a decade. School districts have tightened their belts to the point of touching their backbones. You can easily access the statistics. Teachers and administrators have more than risen to the task. All you have to do is look at our test scores – at the top in the nation – for that proof. But our children can well ask where is the music, the art, and the very necessary physical education that enriches their lives, helps them find their future direction, and opens doors for many. They have the right to ask why their class options have dwindled and their classrooms are crowded.

We want to hear that you understand the public school system is in danger and that you will be a leader in protecting this valuable asset. Public schools have been asked to meet higher standards while their resources have been depleted. At the same time that higher goals have been set for those teaching in public schools, charter schools have been established with lower standards and requirements. We need a leader who demands that the public school system be the source of an excellent education for everyone who attends. The standards should be uniform for all schools funded with public dollars. We need a leader who speaks out about the value of all of us – with our diverse backgrounds, our differing abilities, goals and belief systems – attending school together. It is an essential element of our democracy.    

And we want to hear you ask that we invest more public dollars in our system of higher education to protect its integrity and its access for all our children. The growing reliance on private funding affects academic freedom and the character of our universities. Now the UO has raised the entry bar to 3.5, virtually excluding many of our capable children need and deserve the opportunity to learn and prepare for the future. Our community college is needed more now than ever and yet has had to dramatically reduce its program options while raising tuition.

I could talk to you, Ted, just as honestly about the need for a voice of leadership when it comes to the needs of many Oregonians for jobs, shelter, food, health care, safety and environmental policies that preserve our Oregon. We stand at a crossroads.


Kitty Piercy is a former state representative from Eugene currently serving as public affairs director of Planned Parenthood Health Services of Southwestern Oregon.

Back to Top

 

 


Deadly Arrogance
9/11 and the conscience of America.

In the opinion of this citizen, the U.S. is making grave errors in its response to the events of Sept. 11, 2001, and our leaders would be wise to consider a quote from George Washington: "Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience."

Since 9/11, taxpayers have spent countless billions pursuing a course that does nothing to address the root causes of that tragedy, instead funding policies guaranteed to provoke more terrorism, and a homeland defense program that has attacked our freedoms while failing to produce greater security.

Indeed, 9/11 has provided an excuse for a plethora of policies that project a deadly arrogance instead of the wisdom of a great nation. Looking beyond our borders, one sees that we are not so much defending ourselves as offending the rest of the world. Rather than promote an America for peace, liberty, and justice for all, we thumb our noses at international law and prepare to shed more blood and dollars in an illegal attack — without just cause — on a nation not linked to the tragedy of 9/11.

In his book No More Vietnams, former President Richard Nixon emphasized that America could not and should not go to war without the support of its people and its Congress. As if Osama bin Laden never existed, today we have a president so obsessed with a grudge that we are about to tell the world that an unjust offense is our definition of defense by attacking another country without incitement or any evidence of an imminent threat.

Most Middle East experts agree that a likely outcome of an invasion of Iraq is an Iraqi attack on Israel that will trigger a nuclear conflagration. A certain outcome is the loss of innocent civilian lives. All this to unseat one man? Discussing an invasion so thoroughly, so publicly, is a dangerous provocation in itself and displays a disturbing lack of conscience on the part of our president.

We cannot afford to be a nation without a conscience. Americans of all ages lack medicine and treatment, schools are shutting down, big businesses are robbing employees, small businesses and transportation systems are going under, the surplus is gone, and our environment is severely threatened. At a time when a visionary leader would show compassion and attempt to initiate an era of global peace and justice for a truly secure future, our leader speaks in terms of hundreds of thousands of people as expendable for his own political ends.

This nation has a unique potential, and with it the highest obligation to serve a compassionate vision to the world. We have not earned a right to dominate; we've acquired the ability, and thereby the opportunity, to create a crowning legacy by uniting civilization in a quest for a prosperous and permanent peace in this unforgiving century. We must earn the respect of the world by exercising our finest principles. Anything less is self-destructive, for if we fail to promote a sensible and inclusive approach to the future, we will selfishly squander a tremendous wealth and potential that humankind may never again possess, and in so doing, forever tarnish the magnificence of America.

It is evident that the lessons of the 20th century have been overlooked, even hijacked by our leaders for the purposes of further greed and bloodshed. Rather than seek disarmament of the entire Middle East region and beyond, our country strongly promotes the perpetual pollution and weaponization of the world.

Truly, then, grassroots American activism in pursuit of a peaceful global community is the noblest kind of patriotism, and represents nothing less than the conscience of a civilization striving to evolve beyond the hopeless path of violence. But unless we demand such wisdom in leadership, America will neither succeed economically nor find security in the long term.

Today's Americans did not inherit a finished product. We inherited a work in progress, founded by activists and built by a multicultural populace. Consider me not, therefore, anti-American, but as one who is following George Washington's "spark of celestial fire" on an intellectual quest for freedom that began with the birth of our nation.

It is incumbent upon citizens to speak out and act wisely. Because of America's blatantly careless and belligerent attitude, Sept. 11 has brought me back to graduate school at the age of 46. I'll be focusing on peace studies. And I'll save a seat for President Bush.


Brian Bogart is a lifelong peace activist who worked with Dr. Carl Sagan on the U.S./U.S.SR. Space Bridge project in 1986. He is also a member of the Eugene Middle East Peace Group in Eugene.

Back to Top

 


Stalk Shows
Limbaugh imitators serve ideologues.

Eugene attorney Ed Monks and I rarely listen to talk radio, especially the kind that clutters the daily broadcast schedules of our city's two strongest signals, KPNW and KUGN. Yet in the past month, both of us have spent hours as guests on what we describe as stalk shows. We were invited guests. That doesn't mean we were treated the way guests normally are treated. Our hosts — Lars Larson (once a Eugene newsman), Michael Medved and Jim Greenfield — were in their customary attack mode. That's the pattern they and dozens of other clones of the original, Rush Limbaugh, follow in broadcast markets they monopolize nationwide.

Monks and I were logical targets for these stalkers of the airwaves, having co-founded RADIOACTIVists, a Eugene group that hopes to put a serious dent in the dominance such syndicated programs have nationwide. Monks has written extensively on the demise of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and parallel growth of attack radio.

With a coalition of civic and religious groups in Portland, we've already had an impact on the most outlandish of the talk shows. St. Vincent DePaul in Eugene canceled its ad contract with KUGN for the Michael Savage show after it learned of its content — described by the Portland Coalition as vicious and bigoted toward women and ethnic and religious minorities. In Portland, PGE is the most significant of several sponsors who have canceled contracts with the Savage outlet, KXL.

In my Larson interview, he became livid when I responded to his rapid fire questions with my own question, and he hung up after three minutes. He had spent most of that time complaining that I, as chairman of the Morse Integrity in Government Award, had allowed "a traitor" (Rep. Barbara Lee, Calif.) to receive the award. The talk show format as formulated by domineering types behind the microphone allows hosts to attack, and guests never to attack back.

Monks fared better. When Larsen called him some days later, Monks countered his blatant criticisms with calm responses that included no questions. They talked for an hour. Monks had the same experience with Michael Medved, who fenced with him for an hour.

RADIOACTIVists didn't come together to complain about an absence of courtesy from talk show hosts. We're concerned about what we've heard on Eugene and Portland radio — talk show hosts who spout rightwing extremist views that sometimes border on the violent. The style flourished after President Reagan's crusade to deregulate big business.

These syndicated yellers are planted by ideologues who have discovered saturation of radio signals nationwide is an effective way to brainwash a population. I heard the same thing on my rental car radio during a recent drive through Wisconsin and Illinois.

The format — negative, but sometimes exciting because of its extremism — got rolling in the '90s. Limbaugh imitators have sprung up to push their extremist views — carbon copies of each other — coast-to-coast.

Radio's AM signal has deteriorated to a bottom level not possible if the FCC had not quit on its responsibilities to the public after Reagan gave station owners a blank check. It was created to protect the public interest when commercial radio took shape in the 1940s. Unlike printing, radio stations (and TV, later) use frequencies that belong to the public. As the FCC assigned those valuable spots on the radio dial, it monitored broadcasters to assure a fair hearing for opposing political views, and guarantee a measure of programming "in the public interest."

Nowhere has the invitation for corporate exploitation of the public been more evident than in radio and its expanding big brother, TV. It made a joke of the fairness doctrine. In the process, protections against monopoly ownership of the mass media were dismantled. Administrations looked away as individual stations (and newspapers) were absorbed by monolithic mass media operations. Today, most broadcasters and newspapers are owned by fewer than a dozen of the super-rich.

I've heard from two former FCC commisioners who seem dumbfounded over the failure of their successors to maintain earlier standards of fairness and balance in broadcasting. One, Newton Minow, a Chicago lawyer today, coined the phrase "vast wasteland" for the low standards of early TV programming. The other, Nicholas Johnson, today on the University of Iowa law faculty, shares Minow's concerns about the deterioration of broadcasting fairness.

It will take time for the tide to turn. Maybe the trend has begun. Monks has been invited by Medved to host an hour segment of his program in Monk's own style. Medved may feel he is setting up Monks. I'll bet on the Eugene attorney


George Beres, a Eugene writer, was a Chicago sportscaster in the 1960s. He hosts a weekly public access TV program, "In the Public Interest."

 

 


INSPIRING YANKS
Last night (Sept. 3) the BBC's "Newsnight" program featured a series of interviews with a number of your town's residents.

As you may be aware, the image of the United States' citizenry is none too good at this time, even in England. Your fellow citizens are seen as loud, brash, with no knowledge of world history and incapable of rational thought. This is an image now widely held amongst my fellow countrymen and portrayed widely in the world's media.

The people of Eugene, though, will have done much to correct that impression amongst those who viewed the "Newsnight" report — universally coming across as considerate, thoughtful and knowledgeable of world affairs, regardless of their stance on the Bush administration's response to 9/11, Iraq, etc.

This was the America that inspired countless thousands to cross the oceans in search of a new life; the America that we want to believe in. The people of Eugene are America at its best. Unfortunately, this is a side of the U.S. that is all too often hidden from view. The American dream lives on in Eugene; long may it (and the good citizens of Eugene) continue.

Richard Mansfield
East Sussex, England

 

MISPLACED BLAME
In response to Paige Lehman's letter (8/22) lamenting having to share bathrooms with transgendered people, I have a few comments.

I understand her concerns, based in reality, about wanting to keep herself and her daughter safe in a world where, yes, women are hunted, and we are not safe. But to say that having tolerance for transgendered people will lead to more violence against women is oppressive and simply not true.

When she asks what's to stop any transgender poser from entering and attacking someone in a woman's bathroom, I have to ask: What's to stop any man from doing that whenever he wants, if his intention is to attack someone? A sign on the door is not going to stop him. It never has. We know that it happens. It has nothing to do with transgendered people.

To force a person who identifies as a woman to use the men's bathroom is denying that person's right to exist as they want to, is denying the struggles and the rights of transgendered people everywhere, and is creating a potentially dangerous situation for that person.

Tansgendered people are a very oppressed minority. They are subject to violence and hatred everywhere they go. I think it's important to recognize that and not contribute to more intolerance.

It is unfair of any of us to judge another's gender, to dictate how another can or cannot live, or force someone to stay in a gender role that they reject.

I understand Lehman's fears about safety in general. Violence against women and other minorities is widespread. In order to end it, we need to deconstruct patriarchy and all its forms of violence — including the oppression of those who are different from us.

Olivia Stone
Eugene

 

OPPORTUNISM
Politics sure can twist the facts. What do wilderness designations and environmental regulations have to do with fire?

Let's be clear. The Biscuit Fire started less than a mile within the wilderness and was easily accessible from Bald Mountain Road. And the 100,000-acre Silver Fire of 1987 began almost two air miles outside of the designated wilderness.

In both the Biscuit and Silver fires, the Forest Service withdrew initial crews because needed air support was busy at other fires. The Forest Service has not said that wilderness designations or environmental regulations or lack of roads hampered their efforts in any way. Their concern was for firefighter and public safety.

There are several instances of successful containment of fires in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness. The most recent example was last September. The Craggie fire started deep in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness, more than seven miles from the nearest road. It was put out while still small (275 acres) because needed resources were available.

When speaking about issues as serious as public safety, it's important that we have our facts right. Lack of resources assigned to backcountry fires is what contributes to making them large. Residential safety is best served by thinning and brush removal at the forest edge, not in distant backcountry.

There are many views on the value of wilderness. It's good to debate them. But let's understand that wilderness has nothing to do with the pressing need to reduce the risk to the community fire zone. Don't be fooled. Going after big fire-resistant trees and environmental laws under the pretense of public safety is pure political opportunism.

Lou Gold
Ashland area

 

DISHONORABLE ACTS
How best can we honor the victims of 9/11? We cannot honor them by continuing to kill and maim children, women and men in Afghanistan. We cannot honor them by bombing Baghdad, as our "leaders" have vowed to do. Who will be the victims of that bombing? We cannot honor them by continuing to make war anywhere we choose in the name of retribution for "terrorism."

No! We must not dishonor those who gave their lives on 9/11 with acts of war in their names. Our violence will only breed more violence.

At noon this 9/11, in honor of last year's victims, I suggest we all stop what we are doing and meditate upon peace. In the words of Black Elk: "Know the power that is peace."

Deanne Thompson
Florence

 

HE NEVER ASKED
Just a couple of facts about last week's (8/29) commentary by write-in governor candidate Richard Alevizos: This person was not on the Pacific Green Party (PGP) agenda for nomination or endorsement at any of our conventions. We did not discuss his candidacy. No "contention grew and swirled" around his campaign.

The question of whether or not to support his candidacy was never a question put to any of our conventions. Perhaps he has our party confused with another of the groups to which he shopped his candidacy. He never officially approached the PGP of Oregon.

Hope Marston
Eugene

NO ACCOUNTABILITY
Since Sept. 11, newly disclosed U.S. government documents acquired by the National Security Archive at George Washington University revealed that the U.S. has known for 15-years that the billions it's sent to the government of Colombia weren't fighting drugs, but were being shared with paramilitary death and torture squads to kill union organizers and rural peasants.

Immediately afterwards, the U.S. sent hundreds of millions more dollars there to "fight terror." "Our" president even overrode a U.S. congressional ban on military aid to Indonesia, imposed to protest repeated security-force massacres, just after Indonesia's president told troops this year on Army Day, "Don't worry about human rights."

The global legacy of Sept. 11 has been to enable the world's most powerful "nation on a hill" to reign down terror on anyone it chooses, with no need to explain anything to its uninformed, self-righteous people.

Thanks, TV! America grows sicker every day. Should have called it quits after 1492.

Marshall Kirkpatrick
Eugene

 

MY WEEKLY SMUT
I am writing in response, or should I say in reaction, to the ongoing nasty ads in the back of the paper. What a disappointment. I have read this paper for years, regarding Rob's "Freewill Astrology" as my weekly little blessing. In a not so-joking way I would refer to the column as "my weekly bible verse." Every week I have gathered with friends, drinking good coffee, taking turns reading our weekly forecast.

But as of late, I think not. I am no longer so looking forward to readings due to smut in the back pages. I have my opinions about smut and my opinions about child pornography (which I believe some of these ads tend to border). Has the EW no ethics?

This is certainly no longer a paper that should mix family/kidstuff nor enlightening happenings amongst this type of advertising. It is tasteless, inappropriate and disgraceful.

On the positive side, it's an absolutely perfect example of what would clearly be defined: poor form. I'll give EW an A+ for imitating that.

In closing, as I join in the boycott I pay tribute to the "old rag," in a rhetorical fashion simply stating "What's Happening?"

Caroline Keen
Eugene

 

LIBERAL AUDACITY
There was a time when one had to speculate on the political temper of the people in various states. But with the Internet we can now watch in real-time as Oregon displays itself as a wretched place infested with aging '60s style-communists escaped from northern California. There was a time when Rep. Lee could be branded a traitor and it is appalling to me that Kitty Piercy could recognize simple ideological intemperance in times of national crisis as "courageous."

The sheer audacity of her column (8/22) to point out political defects in the Vietnam War by way of comparison — when, in fact, radical communist sympathizers in this country demonstrating in our streets gave the enemy the political will to survive — is revolting and disgusting. It is a case of the disease calling the patient evil.

To borrow from one of your readers commenting on "Sharing Bathrooms:" "But how far can I be wrestled into 'tolerance' of something that is bizarre, potentially dangerous, and disturbing?" Good question! I assume the rest of us can simply reference your website in the future and find out how Oregon answers. Thank God most citizens of the great U.S. have said "No mas." It is truly amazing that you can consider sharing bathrooms but not common cause.

Art Brown
Big Canoe, Ga.

 

DISSENTERS NEEDED
An overflow crowd at UO's Law Center gave Congress-woman Barbara Lee a standing ovation throughout her awards reception. No wonder — hers was the lone vote against the 9-14 congressional resolution approving the administration's "war on terror."

"It was a blank check to the president to attack anyone involved in the 9/11 events without regard to our nation's long-term foreign policy, economic and national security interests, and without time limit." Senator Morse would have cheered. Not only did he, with Gruening of Alaska vote against the Tonkin Gulf Resolution — which expanded the war in Vietnam — but earlier, in l957 he also voted against the Eisenhower Doctrine giving presidential authority to use military force to help nations "requesting assistance against armed aggression from any country controlled by international communism." Eisenhower sent thousands of marines into Lebanon l8 months later.

Of this, Morse said, "I am not going to vote to give the president any power to make war in the Middle East by a predated declaration of war." He noted that actions in Lebanon were "unconstitutional and authoritarian" and stated that in reality it "is oil our troops were sent to defend. I am not in favor of spilling American blood for oil."

Senator Morse, where are 21st century congressional dissenters to join Barbara Lee? We need people like you more than ever.

Marilyn Dilles
Corvallis

 

PRESSING NEWS
I went to a wonderful Labor Day picnic on Monday at Jaspar Park sponsored by local workers and unions. I got the information about the picnic not from The Register-Guard's "Ticket" section, which did not include it in the week's activities, but from Eugene Weekly, which did.

I find it most interesting that the Guard not only declined to announce the picnic in advance but that it had absolutely no coverage of this annual event, even though it did print an article of pressing local interest about people finding a beached whale in Washington State.

Could the Guard's ongoing battle to keep its employees from having a union contract possibly be coloring its presentation of the news?

Carol Busby
Eugene

 

FED UP
There are things I appreciate in America: the scenery in the American West (insofar as it isn't being destroyed by "development"), the works of great American writers, such as Thomas Wolfe, the universities of Washington, Oregon and California at Berkeley and my friendships past and ongoing with former UW people, and the American contextualist philosophy or world view, which was developed successively by John Dewey, Stephen Coburn Pepper of UC Berkeley, and by my good UW emeritus-friend, Wayne Burns. Has been called the most flexible and adequate of the four major world views. So far, so good.

But otherwise, my patience with this country has long since been exhausted. Theodor Adorno rightly said that in America, one can find capitalism in its purest (most vicious) form, and especially in recent years, it has seemed to me that half the people in the country are trying to get money out of the other half.

Recently, of course, people were righteous about corporate corruption, but the public has a short attention span, and next the topic will be something else. But capitalism didn't stink just recently; it stinks all the time.

And since 1964, I've been waging my private war against capitalism — as anarchist limbo instructor, as humanist, as veteran of baiting and verbal battles, as Wobbly biographer, as one who knows his Marx, as one who is "in and against," and as writer.

Paul Green
Eugene

 

GREAT SITE
I happened to visit your web- site (www.eugeneweekly.com) for the first time today — searching for an article which I found in the Aug. 8 edition. It's an excellent site — heavy on content; no annoying pop-ups or flickering icons, etc.; good organization; straightforward navigation; quick response, including graphics. With the archive, this is a real community asset. Thanks.

Terry Bequette
Eugene

 

TAKE 'EM DOWN
OK, OK — after many years of debating whether or not to take up EW's space with one of my pet peeves, I decided to give in. It's in regard to garage/yard sale signs: I'm a real believer in recycling, re-using, etc., etc. But please, please take down your signs after the sale is over. The signs get to the point where they fall down and just add more litter to the streets, sidewalks and lawns. And when the rains and winds come in the fall, they just come down quicker.

I commute by bike all year round and try to rip down as many as I can, bring them home and recycle them in my blue box. I would take the signs that have an address on them back to the homes, but I figure the people would throw the paper/cardboard away instead of recycling them.

I know in the grand scheme of things, especially with all the current world events, this is a trivial matter. However, it's a matter I wish some people would take seriously.

Kristen Kaminski
Eugene

 

PEED OFF
As I read Norm Maxwell's letter, "Pee Nonsense" (8/15), right after I read a letter, "Millions Up in Smoke" (in The Oregonian), I couldn't help thinking that Jeff Jarvis and Tracy Johnson are also talking about volunteer wildfire fighters.

It is time to stop persecuting humans for using cannabis. It is a simple as 2+2.

Stan White
Dillon, Colo.

 

TACKY AUDIENCE
I have been a student of Marianne Williamson via books/tapes and have also studied The Course in Miracles. I was delighted to be able to hear her speak in person about such important political issues. It was an honor to be in her presence.

The second half of the program was disappointing for me. When Marianne allowed the audience a question and answer session, instead of an interesting session based on the first hour of spirituality and politics, it was primarily people standing up to advocate their own local causes — announcing rallies they hold, website addresses and the like. Where were the relative, intelligent questions or comments?

To the woman who expressed her (long-winded) opinion that the world is full of abuse, anger and hate due to circumcision: First, did you not know that Marianne is Jewish? Second, your comments influenced me to do some research on the subject. It appears Jesus, one of the most peaceful, giving, spiritual human embodiments to ever walk the face of the Earth was circumcised. And Adolph Hitler was not.

To the woman who stood up and put Marianne on the spot in regard to a "sliding scale" fee to see her: Please. The nominal charge of $25 is very reasonable compared to some of the other world renowned spiritual teachers. You could have at least talked to her individually (as many people did) instead of getting up to the microphone for that. Tacky.

Lisa Powell
Westfir

 

WOMEN AS PROPERTY
I have wracked my brain searching for a compelling argument to explain why the sex ads the EW carries make me cringe and feel disappointed in humanity. At the risk of sounding hysterical and extreme, I believe a connection exists between these ads and the murders of the two adolescent Lincoln City girls.

Miranda and Ashley are dead because they became the object of sexual obsession for a sick, violent man. These ads perpetuate the idea that females are products to consume, and their human qualities are a threat, inconvenience and distraction.

Women are considered a minority because they still fight for independence on political and economic fronts. Less than 100 years ago, women were still considered property. I am not a prude, and I have no objection to people expressing sexuality. I do object to economic inequality that commercializes sex. Let's face it, most women strip for money, not for love or fame.

It is irresponsible and disingenuous to pass off responsibility for the content of the EW as a disconnection between the advertising and editorial staff. They are also exploiting for cash, and it degrades the content of the articles. If the silent majority can't change the EW's minds, EW risks becoming part of the corruption it sometimes exposes.

Also, I have been noticing over the past year that about 75 percent of the letters to the editor are from men. Do women write less frequently, or is it bias?

Kelly Bogan
Eugene

HOOP JUMPING
Thanks for Hope Marston's excellent article (8/29) on the police brutality that accompanied Dubya's August (not august) visit to Portland. Dubya was here ostensibly to gather in the hundreds of thousands of dollars needed by the Elected Elite to continue the control of this undemocratic country of ours.

Marston, in the concluding paragraph of her article, says, in part, "… run for office and work on campaign signs for third-party candidates to shake up the corporate status quo."

Sure, I agree. I tried to run for the Oregon House of Representatives on the Socialist Party ticket. The Socialists have attained ballot status in this Oregon U.S. House District at least six years ago. The congressional party for any minority party must at least attain 1 percent of the votes cast to maintain ballot status for the next election. The Socialist Party of Oregon did that. But, alas, the Republocrats have created more hoops for minority parties to jump through.

A minority party must, in accordance with Oregon Revised Statutes 248.008, "register 0.5% of the total number of all registered voters in this state after the current primary, but 90 days before the general election." The Socialist Party, at least in the 4th U.S. House District, was 16 registered voters short of that magic percentage. Accordingly, neither I nor any of my Socialist colleagues who were nominated by the party for other offices in the upcoming November race were accorded ballot access. So much for working for the Socialist Party's candidate as "third-party candidates."

Nope! The plain and simple truth is that the corporate world has bought the so-called democratic process in this country and that "democratic process" is evidenced by the Republocratic Party, the one and only viable "political" party in the U.S.

Karl G. Sorg
Eugene


LETTERS POLICY: We welcome letters on all topics and will print as many as space allows. Please limit length to 250 words, keep submissions to once a month, and include your address and phone number. E-mail to editor@eugeneweekly.com, fax to 484-4044, or mail to 1251 Lincoln, Eugene 97401.

Back to Top



Table of Contents | News | Views | Arts & Entertainment
Classifieds | Personals | EW Archive