Advertiser













   




Insider Baseball : The Worst Way: Gloves come off in Salem. propaganda.
Natural Resistance : For Whats Right: Taking a stand is a positive thing.
Viewpoint: Non-Sensical Syllogisms: Are the latest anti-drug commercials bad for kids?
Letters: EW readers sound off.



The Worst Way
Gloves come off in Salem.

SALEM: Sunday, June 30 - Special Session III - Day 19 Salem Senator Peter Courtney is a veteran of 13 special sessions; he described this one as the most bizarre yet -- 90 legislators were held hostage for 19 days by nine Republican senators who were blinded by their ideology and an internal fight over leadership that ended in anarchy -- while the rest of us watched. The session mercifully ended at 5 oclock this morning.

In last weeks column I described the right-wing coup that took place among the Senate Republicans. As I predicted, Colonel Clink (Steve Harper) and eight of his warlords produced a øno-new-taxesÓ package -- it included $149 million in cuts to K-12, the UO, community colleges, and programs for the working poor, seniors and the disabled -- alongside two new tax breaks for the wealthy.

It was appalling.

They also proposed sending out the clone of Ballot Measure 13, the $220 million theft of the education endowment fund that you defeated in May. Remember, this endowment fund currently pays for opportunity grants now for thousands of financially eligible Oregon college students who would have been left out in the cold if this measure had passed. They put in their Arthur Anderson-like accounting scheme to delay payments to K-12 and community colleges into the next biennium and they stole money from every available piggy bank, leaving us with a massive hole in the next biennium.

Im happy to report the proposal failed by a 15 to 15 vote, with Republicans Lenn Hannon and Vern Duncan voting with the Democrats (with the exception of Mae Yih -- no surprise) to defeat the measure. So, after five days of being held hostage to these morons, we resumed the business of responsibly balancing the $860 million hole.

We blew it.

The right-wingers who lost threw a hissy fit and refused to vote for anything in the compromise package. So it took 13 Democrats and five so-called ømoderateÓ Republicans -- I never thought Id see the day when Id call Gene Derfler a moderate (its all relative) -- to create a final budget.

To accommodate the Republicans, we had to vote for $50 million in cuts and $611 million in one-time money. The clone of BM13 was reduced to $150 million and placed on the ballot for September, along with the cigarette tax. And we did more bonding than agent 007 -- we put the state in debt for the next six years!

Even poor Susan Castillo, our next State Superintendent of Education, spoke in favor of the BM13 clone. øI hope all of us will work really hard to pass this measure, because our kids really need the education dollars,Ó she said. My response during that debate was, øLets rephrase it: We need money for schools in the worst way, and this is the worst way.Ó I mean, when are we going to vote for real, stable school funding if we keep giving in to these band-aid gimmicks? Im a NO. I refused to vote for the package for two days just to get more money on the table.

I was outraged that my Democratic leaders would agree to cuts in Employment Related Day Care -- affordable childcare is the single largest obstacle in getting poor mothers back to work -- without even letting us vote on delaying Dubyas new tax break for corporations (accelerated depreciation). We were going to give corporations a new $124 million break and cut programs to juvenile corrections treatment and community corrections?

So Lane County released 4,500 inmates through early matrix last year -- many of them Class C felon property offenders wholl just go through the revolving door a bit quicker with no consequences -- because of the states chronic underfunding of jail beds under Senate Bill 1145; but were willing to cut their program more deeply for this tax break?

Bullshit.

In the sausage of politics, I got half of what I wanted; the corporations got their break but we restored $7 million to these programs.

The funniest scene in the session occurred when our minority leader, Kate Brown, asked the majority leader, Dave Nelson, how many votes his members would supply on a certain measure. øI dont know,Ó Nelson replied, øI told them to vote their conscience.Ó Kates reply to us was, øRight there, I knew they only had three or four.Ó

I cant wait to hear from the Governor when he gets back from France -- cant imagine hell be too happy.


Sen. Tony Corcoran of Cottage Grove represents portions of Lane and Douglas counties in the newly formed Senate District 4, which now includes the UO area. He can be reached at corcoran.sen@state.or.us

 

Back to Top



For Whats Right
Taking a stand is a positive thing.

øThe trouble with environmental activists is theyre against everything, and they want to protect everything.Ó Its a common charge. But the trouble with the word øeverythingÓ is that it isnt particularly informative. Consider, for example, some current environmental campaigns in Oregon:

Against: Construction of the West Eugene Parkway.

For: Ecological connectedness of Eugenes now-rare wetlands, and the ability of people to visit these parklands rather than a highway.

Against: Elk farming in Oregon.

For: Protection of Oregons wild elk, deer, and potentially humans from tuberculosis and chronic wasting disease, which is the elk and deer equivalent of mad cow disease.

Against: Dumping of toxic industrial wastes into Oregons agricultural fertilizers.

For: Clean farm soils, salmon streams, drinking water, food crops, and farm families.

Against: Permitting a gravel mine and asphalt plant along River Road.

For: Survival of River Road family farms and extensive wildlife habitat along the Willamette River.

 

If you simply switch the words øagainstÓ and øforÓ in the above examples, you can see that those who propose and defend such things as the West Eugene Parkway, elk farms, toxic waste fertilizers, and a River Road gravel mine are in reality against a lot of things you depend upon or love.

So why do environmental activists take the rap of being øagainst everythingÓ while developers, construction companies, mine owners, industrial waste distributors, and their boosters assume the mantle of being the positive folks?

The problem is not a lack of environmental proposals. There are plenty of proposals for sustainable agriculture, forestry, fisheries, transportation, trade, energy, health care, population, and consumption. The rap arises from the nature of these proposals:

1. øIdleness is the Devils own invention.Ó Letting pond turtles, wild elk, or small blue butterflies live out their lives in healthy ecosystems isnt generally labeled as an accomplishment. Paul Bunyan, developers, and toxics-using industries do something. To many in our society, øliving simply so others may simply liveÓ is simply a code word for øunproductive.Ó

2. Old profits generate strong defenses. Environmentalists proposals often involve changes in business. Those currently reaping profits then claim environmentalists are against øbusiness,Ó by which they mean their particular way of doing business. In reality, the question is which kinds of business are needed. Clean farming or toxic farming? Wind power or nuclear power? Light transit or heavy freeways? Nodal neighborhood development or sprawl?

3. Unsustainable is easier. Environmentalists proposals often require system changes and more social coordination than current unsustainable approaches. For example, altering a production process to use fewer toxics is initially more complicated than sending toxic wastes to a fertilizer factory. Developing global climate-protecting transportation systems for communities involves more innovation than punching a 300-foot wide highway through wetlands.

4. Big money backs big impacts. Think of genetic engineering; nuclear power; agribusiness; off-road vehicles and SUVs; and large-home, big-box developments. In comparison, modest and innovative solutions proposed by environmentalists are generally under-capitalized and dont promise windfall profits. They arent backed by massive industry research and development or advertising funds. Think of the thin investments in local agriculture, affordable housing, public transportation, or energy conservation.

5. Strait-jacket goals. Often, environmentalists solutions address larger goals than those envisioned by promoters of environmentally destructive projects. For instance, proponents of the West Eugene Parkway often ask, øIf you oppose building this highway in the wetlands, then what route do you propose?Ó However, the responsible solution to traffic in and out of West Eugene may in fact be a combination of land use planning, public transit, street modifications, and no highway.

There can never be enough excellent, thoughtful options on the table. Indeed, one of the redeeming graces of humans is our ability to modify dead-end behaviors. Environmental activists are people who understand how certain activities are unnecessarily destructive of life and spirit on Earth, and know those activities can be changed. Many of their proposals are time-tested and proven; some are sketchy and need development. But at their core, environmental activists are øforÓ far more than they are øagainstÓ: They are standing up for you and all your relations here on Earth.


Mary OBrien has worked as a public interest scientist for the past 20 years. Her new book, Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment, has been published by The MIT Press. She can be reached at mob@efn.org

 

Back to Top


Non-Sensical Syllogisms:
Are the latest anti-drug commercials bad for kids?

In a $3.4 million ad campaign, the two latest anti-drug commercials use a new twist on the usual fear tactics used to scare kids from drugs. The ads also use every parents secret tool of persuasion: the guilt trip. Perhaps the ads have positive intention, but they dont educate about intoxicants or addiction.

Instead they misinform and may actually be destructive. The commercials use non-sensical syllogisms to convince kids that if they buy drugs, they are contributing to terrorism. Its a smart campaign, playing off the post-Sept.11th patriotism, but is simply not true. It would be like saying that if I once threw rice at a wedding, I am responsible for the extinction of a particular bird. A plus B does not equal C.

Yes, some drug money may end up in the pocket of a terrorist, but terrorists may also earn their living in other ways. Are kids to understand that if they are given free drugs its okay, seeing as how they paid no terrorists?

The first commercial, øAK-47,Ó uses MasterCards øpricelessÓ ad-style, showing various price listings, such as øFake ID $3,000,Ó øExplosives $,1200,Ó and øAK-47 $250.Ó The prices are in between odd images, like a house at dusk, a guy on a computer next to a briefcase, and a car trunk full of guns. The ad, at the end, asks øWhere do terrorists get their money? If you buy drugs some of it might be from you.Ó

George W. Bush may be the inspiration for these ads. At www.theantidrug.com (where you can view the commercials in the media gallery), there is a quote from the president stating øIf you quit drugs, you join the fight against terror in America.Ó Wouldnt that also be true, then, if Americans quit flying, quit the stock market, quit pushy foreign service policies, all of which have had a more direct influence on terrorism in the US?

The other commercial, øI Helped,Ó has an odd, eerie tone and dark mood. Its filmed in black and white and shows various kids, each confessing to a different crime, such as øI helped kidnap peoples dads -- hey some harmless fun,Ó øI helped a bomber get a fake passport,Ó and øI helped kill a judge,Ó each said in monotone, guiltless voices.

Neither commercial provides any anti-drug information, such as dependency, health consequences, or legal risks, all more vital topics than terrorism when concerning drugs. Furthermore, neither violence nor guilt are a helpful focus in teens who today are already higher in depression, and who already fear violence from their peers. Plus, some teens may take too seriously the guilt of contributing to terrorism after having once bought a bag of weed. In an age group with such high suicide rates (third cause of death among teens, and still rising), its irresponsible to feed them a guilt trip.

By focusing on street drugs, the commercials are further misleading. It sends a mixed message to a generation of pharmaceutically altered minds, the kids who are fed pill after pill by parents and doctors. The hidden message is that prescription drugs are not a problem (after all, theyre purchased at a pharmacy), though dependency on them is a large risk to todays youth.

Also, in these patriotic times, kids see the øall-AmericanÓ ads and slogans for beer, and perhaps do not see the larger risk of alcohol abuse, the most deadly risk to American youth. According to MADD, alcohol kills 6.5 times more than all other illicit drugs combined and is the number one drug problem among young people. Anti-drug commercials would better inform kids if they focused on all intoxicants and their direct dangers, especially alcohol and pharmaceutical drugs.

Street drugs are a smaller threat to American youth, since most kids have access to prescription pills and alcohol in their own homes.

These latest anti-drug ads do a disservice to youth and provide no true information. Its time kids be told the truth about drugs, a much easier and greater deterrent, rather than being fed non-sensical syllogisms. Besides, leave the guilt trips for parents.


Melissa Lewis, MA, is a Eugene writer and teacher. Shes currently working on her first collection of short stories.

 

Back to Top


HELPING SCHOOLS
Health care costs are spiraling upward to the detriment of schools with insurance premiums increasing 20 percent a year.

Health Care For All-Oregon has a 3 to 11.5 percent payroll cost that often undercuts present insurance premiums from 3 to 9 percent and therefore saves school districts thousands to millions of dollars. Scappoose would save $344,000, Corvallis saves $497,000, Centennial $563,000, Eugene 4J $2.3 million and North Clackamas $3,540,000. The City of Portland would save approximately $9.5 million in 2002.

With schools looking forward to a future of yearly budget cuts, we encourage everyone to learn more about about this measure on the web at www.HCAO.org and volunteer. The petitioning has ended and now we must inform our friends about this more efficient, cost-saving medical care plan for all Oregonians. Call 484-6145 for information.

Ruth Duemler
Eugene

 

EGREGIOUS BEHAVIOR
As many of you may have read this past week (6/20), the three of us (Brett Cole, Jim Flynn and Josh Laughlin) settled our five-year-old civil rights lawsuit against the City of Eugene and its police department. Although there was no official admission of guilt in the settlement, the city and the police department finally accepted some responsibility for their egregious behavior on June 1, 1997.

In response to their gross misuse of pepper spray, they coughed up $30,000 to keep this case from going to trial. They also agreed to have Eugene police officers ranked sergeant and above attend a series of trainings in dealing with nonviolent demonstrators. In the courtroom, the June 1st incident is over. Outside, though, that dark day will live with many in our community for a long time.

The incident shined a light on issues that have been festering in our city. Corporate welfare, police brutality and heritage tree preservation all came to the forefront. Why was the city in such a rush to cut those 39 trees that they had to douse us with chemical agents to make way for a publicly subsidized parking garage for Symantec (which has since left town)? We simply wanted to hold off the illegal cutting until it could be adequately addressed at the next nights City Council meeting. We would hope that the city would act differently if the same situation arose today.

The small settlement is a bit of a hard pill to swallow, especially since Jim has a permanent neck injury from officers Ted Williams and Tom Turner (under the supervision of incident commander Becky Hanson) torquing his neck, yanking his hair and punching his body. Its also unclear what the long-term health risks are of receiving up to 15-20 cans of pepper spray on ones body. But weve got more pressing issues to focus on, and its time to move on. May June 1, 1997 be a date that we all never forget.

Brett Cole, Jim Flynn, Josh Laughlin
Eugene

RARE SERVICE
In Aryn Nolascos letter (6/20) is the statement øEugene ... has the worst public transportation of any city I have ever lived in ...Ó I would like to know where Nolasco has lived, because for a city the size of Eugene to have such an extensive bus service, as it does, is a rarity throughout the U.S.

Fresno, Calif., where I am from, is several times the size of Eugene, but the bus service there offers less than half the number of routes LTD does, stops at 9 pm, and more often than not runs up to 20 minutes late. After moving up here and finding out I could quickly and reliably get almost anywhere in town up until 11:40 pm for only $35 a month, I about had an epiphany, and have been intentionally without a car ever since.

Anyone who is literate enough to read a bus schedule and take the minimal extra effort to plan their trip will not be østranded,Ó for the Riders Digest is anything but øconvoluted.Ó As long as there are low-income, teenage, elderly, disabled, frugal, or earth-friendly people in Eugene, as there always will be, LTD will definitely not øbe gone in 10 years due to lack of interest.Ó

Ashley Wright
Eugene

 

STRESSING SYSTEM
First, I would like to commend Wendy Strgar for creating and putting the necessary energy into the Eugene Childrens Peace Academy. I believe that creating such a school, in contrast to a military academy, makes great sense. However, I have concerns that creating another elementary school is going to stress an already strained school system. It seems to make much more sense to begin at the middle or high school level and work down if the need is seen.

If you think an elementary school that teaches the basics of peace doesnt exist, I have to tell you differently. I know a school where the children are taught to work together and work out their differences peacefully. They learn to respect all the members of their school community. Any violent actions, even in play, are dealt with quickly and decisively.

There is a cultural and social mix of children in most classrooms and people from around the world are brought in to talk to their students about life in other countries. This school is called Adams/Hillside school. My child attends Adams Neighborhood School and couldnt get a better start in understanding peace anywhere else.

Melanie Namkoong
Eugene

 

 

SCARY FOR DRIVERS
I read with interest your article about the traffic mess along 24th to 29th and Willamette. I have lived in that area since 1987 and have watched the traffic congestion get progressively worse. Something needs to be done.

However, you missed half of the problem with your emphasis on bicyclists (who really should just avoid the street altogether if possible -- its far too dangerous) and pedestrians. As a driver, it scares the hell out of me. There are too many driveways with people trying to get onto the street and too many drivers trying to turn left. Its a nightmare. I find that I do errands only on the right side of the street (in either direction) at a time so I dont have to try to pull across or turn left. Its not convenient and, like the pedestrians, I avoid some stores or services -- because theyre a left turn away. I also take other routes when I can -- down to the lower streets to either 24th, 27th or 29th where there are signals.

And when I leave the parking lot from Market of Choice (its not PC Market any more), I go out on 29th unless Im turning right. And its only going to get worse before someone makes it a priority.

Carol Busby
Eugene

 

BASIC NEEDS
With the support of four councilors, the Eugene City Council has set Aug. 14 for a work session on the living wage ordinance. The proposal would affect city workers, workers contracted by the city, and workers of companies receiving from the city significant tax reductions.

The work session is good because the council needs to look at ways to stop using our taxes to pay poverty level wages, and because our community needs to recognize that it takes $12 hour for a single parent family with one child to meet a basic needs budget, excluding savings and retirement. Most of our new jobs do not meet this minimum.

We can help pass the ordinance by calling our councilors and by attending living wage activities, including the August work session. Call Eugene Springfield Solidarity Network for information: 736-9041.

Erik Muller
Eugene

 

WORD OF GOD
Lynn Warner (6/27) begins her letter by quoting Gandhi, further exemplifying the cult of the personality that is pacifism. Pacifists apparently feel that Gandhis word is the word of God.

Lynns horrified that SOME anarchists can support violent acts and still be committed to anti-authoritarianism. She claims theres nothing more authoritarian than murder. I disagree. I believe that being able to impose your will on the entire globe with military might is the ultimate act of domination.

Anarchists recognize that violence is authoritarian. But whats more authoritarian is not using violence to stop oppressors from subjugating, exploiting, even exterminating others. Lynn cant comprehend that one could justify killing McKinley. This is because shes unaware, or doesnt care, that McKinley waged a genocidal campaign against Filipinos. During the Nazi era, anarchists unsuccessfully attempted to assassinate Mussolini and Franco. Would those killings have been authoritarian, or acts of killing for the common good?

Lynn ends her letter by claiming that øthe means chosen to enact social change predetermine the result.Ó Shes right. But since theres no such thing as ønon-violent revolutions,Ó theres no way of knowing if the results would be better than previous revolutions.

Few revolutions have had the results that anarchists hope for. But the fact is that many revolutions have had positive effects that pacifism couldnt achieve. Previous revolutions degenerated because of a lack of commitment to egalitarianism, not violence per se. Future revolutions will fare better if theres widespread commitment to egalitarianism.

Eric Blair, GA Collective
Eugene

 

POULTRY PARITY
I can understand Jerry Harriss resentment toward Swedish society (6/19). At times, it can be a tough place to live. As the poor sibling among the Scandinavian countries for most of recorded history (Sweden became prosperous only after the Industrial Revolution), the country has deep roots of conformity and a distrust of unusual perspectives. Compared with neighboring Denmark, which has always been one big, bountiful farm with an open attitude and a lively pub culture, Sweden can seem dour and dark. Ever seen a cheerful Bergman film? And geographically, Sweden is separated from the landmass of Europe by the Baltic Sea, which hasnt helped its ethnic situation.

Even so, the Sweden of the 60s, 70s and 80s was remarkably culturally open, and it was popular for families to adopt orphans from Asia and Africa. The country was openly against our Vietnam War and immigrants were treated royally.

Since the economic crunch of the late 80s, however, attitudes have become more conservative. And in Sweden, like the rest of Europe, the massive influx of immigrants -- mainly from Muslim countries -- has created a situation where many Swedes now feel their traditional culture and values are threatened. Its not a good time to be a different-looking foreigner.

Hopefully, and most likely, Sweden and Europe will soon work through the process of assimilating their new citizens and emerge the stronger for it. The governments and many activists seem to be working hard at it.

As for the alleged $15 chickens: My wife, who has just returned from Sweden and who, like Mr. Harris, very practically values things according to the number of chickens that can be bought for the same money, reports that they cost $1.22 a pound, $1 on sale -- pretty much the same as here.

Joe Valasek
Eugene

 

TAX MY POT, PLEASE
I once read a wonderful book, How to Stay Alive in the Woods, by Bradford Angier. In the second chapter Mr. Angier takes the reader to Lost Cabin Creek where -- in the Lost Cabin -- four prospectors died of starvation. The author then points out the abundance of edible food surrounding the cabin.

Which brings me to Gov. Kitzhaber and the clowns in the Oregon Legislature. These Bozos are running around unable to find money, which is readily available.

Personally, I do not own property, so increased property tax will not affect me. I make little money so increased income tax will not affect me much. I dont smoke tobacco, so I wont pay that sin tax at all, and I drink little alcohol, so that sin tax will have little effect.

I smoke marijuana. I would not mind paying a øsinÓ tax on my marijuana. I want to pay tax on my marijuana. I am begging to pay tax on my marijuana. Just legalize it and tax away.

But the government does not want my money.

Chris Pender
Eugene

OPEN HOUSE
I am writing out of concern for an event that took place at the Cottage Grove Ranger Station May 30. The event was referred to as an øopen house,Ó yet there were 12 armed policemen, including county sheriffs. Those who came were videotaped, with their license plate numbers run through police computers. Visitors were allowed to enter the building singly only if they were seen as non-threatening. One woman burst into tears as she was judged unfit to enter the building, which was guarded with an abundance of yellow tape.

Maybe the events of the previous open house were not what the Forest Service expected, but there was no display of violence or aggression. A flag was stolen; however, it was returned. Yet we did not deserve this.

Especially when the concerns are for clear drinking water and the plight of publicly owned lands. The local populace that pays taxes is the true owner of the national forest. The public meetings that used to take place at the Community Center on Gibbs Avenue are no longer. Is this how our dialogue is supposed to take place: Police-escorted citizens allowed to enter singly surrounded by armed guards? No, this is not an environment that can foster such a thing.

I think it is a travesty that the Cottage Grove Ranger Station has to use such extreme measures to control the public they are supposed to be serving. It threatens my civic right as a concerned citizen interested in our government, and this intimidation makes me afraid to express myself. In my opinion, the Cottage Grove Ranger Station stands to be reprimanded and questioned for using such measures as at the last open house.

Kerstin E. Britz
Eugene

 

FEAR OF BUSH
EW, your silence on the matter of the Bush administration locking up civilian American citizens with absolutely no rights whatsoever to any of the U.S. Constitutions Bill of Rights in a military brig, leads me to believe either your silence equals consent, or youre in fear of the Bush administration. If so, it demonstrates you will not be winning any awards for a øprofile in courage.Ó

By the way, guess what, EW? None of your stories about WEP, Hynix, etc. will matter when we who are willing to stand up for our rights are all rotting in military brigs, while fascism is the rule of the day for the sheep who remain.

Jack Myreng
Eugene

 

NASTY STUFF
Although I am very glad to see your paper cover reggae events regularly, please do not ever have Ben Fogelson write another reggae-related article. His moronic øinterviewsÓ with Skelly (of Israel Vibrations, 6/6) and Toots Hibbert (6/13) were both insulting and borderline disrespectful.

When He asked Skelly, øHave you ever found anything nasty in your dreads?Ó all I could think was, øBen, have you ever found anything between your ears?Ó

Brian Greshock
Eugene

 

WHOS IN CHARGE?
Being a resident of the Friendly Street neighborhood and a regular shopper in the area, I read the EWs article (6/20) about South Willamette Street with great interest. Assuming Mr. Pittmans piece is accurate, a question comes to mind: Who is running this town?

For years, the City Council has recognized the traffic problems on the street. The citizens who live, work and shop on the strips between 24th and 29th have been begging for improvements. The city itself paid for a study that gave them a blueprint to follow. What am I missing?

Re-striping the five blocks to provide a bike lane, a north and south one-way lane and a center turning lane would cost the city the price of the paint. We already own the equipment and have experienced, skilled personnel. The argument that the street would require bus turnouts doesnt wash. Parts of 18th Avenue have been functioning very nicely without turnouts, as are many other streets in the city. The lack of turnouts is why LTD installed blinking arrows on the buses.

If re-striping the strip would be less than perfect because of the many driveways, so be it. Take it one step at a time. Once the strip is a safer, more consumer-friendly area, business might improve, and then anything is possible.

This city will spend millions of dollars to create streets but will not spend pennies to correct a problem. It makes me wonder who is running this town.

Norman Bellitt
Eugene


LETTERS POLICY: We welcome letters on all topics and will print as many as space allows. Please limit length to 250 words, keep submissions to once a month, and include your address and phone number. E-mail to editor@eugeneweekly.com, fax to 484-4044, or mail to 1251 Lincoln, Eugene 97401.

Back to Top



Table of Contents | News | Views | Arts & Entertainment
Classifieds | Personals | EW Archive