Viewpoint: The Next Step: Access remains a big issue as we fight to protect Roe v. Wade.
Natural Resistance: Ignoring the Evidence: Science gets skewed in the debate over gravel vs. family farms. Part I.
Living Out:
Spud Love: It takes times to melt into it.
Letters: EW readers sound off.


The Next Step
Access remains a big issue as we fight to protect Roe v. Wade.

As a young woman, I never would have guessed that I would spend 25 years working to protect the right of women to reproductive health care that is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution (Roe v. Wade, the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court Decision). I had my children to raise and I loved my job as a teacher.

I signed up at a fair booth, little knowing that this would be the beginning of such a long and challenging journey. A member of the local National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) team invited me to attend a meeting, and so began years of working booths, canvassing, organizing meetings and rallies, working on campaigns, serving on boards, giving speeches, lobbying and all manner of "in the trenches" work, even serving as a representative in the Oregon Legislature for six years in a daily and continuous effort to protect the well-being of women and their families.

It was difficult for me to speak in public; my voice quavered and my knees knocked. I thought I would never get comfortable being a spokesperson and I endured several years of high-level discomfort before it finally became a little easier. I did it because I believe a woman is not truly free, nor a fully enfranchised citizen, unless she can decide when to have a child in consultation with her family, her doctor and her God. I believe children have the right to be born where they are wanted and cared for, and the consequences of forced parenting exacts a high price on the unwanted children.


I have heard a lot of life stories from women
who have needed access to abortion. I have held hands and driven some of them up the I-5 corridor to receive care. I have never had reason to doubt the right to choose is important to the well-being of women and their families in this country. Often the decisions have been difficult and heart-felt and the ultimate in taking responsibility for their personal health or family needs. Often their decisions have been made more difficult by those who believe they should not have the right to make this fundamental choice for their lives.

I can recall many cold or rainy mornings standing with others outside of clinics to protect the women and the physicians who provided their care. I cannot speak with enough praise for the physicians and clinic staff who endure threats to themselves and their families because they know how important this health service is to their patients. It is outrageous that this country has tolerated the high level of violence visited upon those who serve in this capacity.


In Oregon, thousands of us have worked
to defeat every anti-choice bill and initiative, and we stand tall as a state that understands and values this fundamental freedom. Now we are in the 29th year of protecting this right. We have a president who took office with the promise that he would work to overturn Roe v. Wade and this could well happen with the appointment of a single Supreme Court justice.

In Oregon, there are anti-choice majorities in both houses of the Legislature and we are losing the pro-choice governor who vetoed any anti-choice legislation in the last four sessions. Opponents of this right had more than $300,000 in their political coffers to influence the outcome of the last election.

So, I continue to work for the preservation of reproductive healthcare and rights, now for Planned Parenthood Health Services of Southwestern Oregon. I join others in working for an enhanced vision of choice that goes beyond rights to include access, not just to abortion but to the full range of reproductive healthcare services. I visited France, Germany and the Netherlands last summer and learned that there they have much lower rates of unintended pregnancies and abortion than in the U.S. They view abortion as the failure of communication and contraception and in general as a health issue, not a moral issue. What a relief it would be if we could lead the way to such an attitude in this country.

Join in this work. Vote, support family planning and pro-choice organizations. Those who oppose abortion should join with us to ensure that our children have the information and means to protect themselves from unintended pregnancies and the ability to make healthy decisions for their lives.

Then I could retire.


Kitty Piercy is a former state legislator and currently public affairs director for Planned Parenthood Health Services of Southwest Oregon.

Back to Top



Natural Resistance by Mary O'Brien
Ignoring the Evidence
Science gets skewed in the debate over gravel vs. family farms. Part I.

It can be tempting to throw up your hands and walk away when documents pile up on opposing sides of an issue. Too complicated, too technical, too many contradictory claims. But often a simple question lies at the heart, and documents pile up because someone is wanting to avoid the clear answers.

Here's an example: Eugene Sand & Gravel (ES&G) wants to destroy prime farm land to operate a gravel mine and crusher, and manufacture asphalt amid River Road family farms. Before they can do this, however, Oregon law requires them to show that there is a gravel layer thick enough, and of quality high enough to justify destroying that farm land.

Specifically, Oregon law requires ESG to demonstrate, by means of "a representative set of samples," that there is a gravel layer averaging at least 60 feet thick beneath the soil "overburden." Also, the gravel must undergo a series of tests showing the gravel meets Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) specifications for road-building.

During the past year, UO geology Prof. Mark Reed has volunteered his time preparing more than a dozen documents which show that:

-- ESG has not sampled the gravels in a manner that is "representative," according to either basic scientific methods or national and professional highway engineering testing standards. These standards require drilling in proposed mining areas, and testing the gravel separately in strata that differ from each other. ES&G hasn't done this. They've sampled drill holes in only one of the three proposed mining areas, and mixed together distinctly different gravel layers from top to bottom, before testing it.

-- The gravel layer beneath the "overburden" of farm soil is 53, not 60 feet thick (see diagram). Underneath these 53 feet of gravel lies a 10- to 14-foot clay layer, with even older gravel beneath, which appears to be cemented together, like bedrock. This stuff is likely to be economically infeasible to mine, and would probably fail the ODOT tests. However, ES&G has never tested this layer separately to show whether it meets ODOT specifications.

The reason Reed has been writing so many documents is that ESG and Lane County planning staff have seemed intent on ignoring scientific evidence. For example, ES&G and County planning staffer Thom Lanfear have invented a bizarre definition of the term "overburden," which Oregon's Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) subsequently accepted without seeking or considering any professional opinion. They define the 14 feet of clay lying beneath the 53 feet of gravel as "overburden." Lanfear then recommended that the commissioners simply add the gravel layer beneath the clay barrier (newly christened as overburden) to the 53 feet of gravel above the clay bed to meet state law requiring a layer (singular) of 60 feet of gravel beneath overburden. However, calling the buried clay bed an overburden is like calling the floorboards of a house part of its roof. Even ES&G's hired geologist admits that professional geologists refer to overburden as material that lies at the surface of the ground.

Though it's not clear what prompted DLCD to go along with Lanfear's novel definition of overburden, Steven Pfeiffer was at the time both chair of the commission that oversees DLCD, and ES&G's company attorney. Pfeiffer has an obvious interest in whether buried clay layers can be called "overburden."

In this gravel vs. family farms saga, Lanfear has dismissed more than just Reed's scientific evidence. Other scientists have studied ES&G's documents and have determined that the proposed gravel mine would likely dewater neighboring farms during summer and expose the farms to crop-reducing dusts and toxic asphalt-production chemicals. Lanfear's memo refutes none of these scientists' evidence and yet recommends that the Commissioners assume these problems won't occur.

This all leads to an even bigger issue. When judges and juries are faced with "dueling scientists," they have to wade through the science to decide who is being most accurate. How can we be assured that county staff and commissioners are paying attention to scientific evidence which, like Reed's, provides uncomfortable answers in controversial situations? Next time, I'll suggest a way of doing this that has worked elsewhere, and could be adopted in Lane County.


Mary O'Brien has worked as a public interest scientist for the past 20 years. She can be reached at mob@efn.org

Back to Top



Spud Love
It takes times to melt into it.

I wasn't looking for love. Having a fling was fine, but nothing long-term for me, thanks. My "Forever" relationships had always ended in ugly scenes and late-night door slamming. Who would want that to last till the end of time?

My real "Love Forever" came disguised as your run-of-the-mill, crotch-throbbing attraction. We'd known each other socially for years, but no sparks. Exactly one month before our first night together, the future love of my life interviewed me about my trip to Gay Lobby Day on the radio show she hosted. I was nervous, she was cool, competent, a woman in charge.

I couldn't take my eyes off those chubby little fingers diddling the console knobs. During a break she took off her headphones. "You're shy aren't you?" Wonga wonga!

Something got me about her seeing the tender inner self behind my out 'n proud persona. I drove away from the radio station vowing she'd be my next fling. Only for the sex, of course.

I invited her to stuff envelopes at the non-profit where I volunteered. She had a meeting. I asked her if she wanted to go to the Pride rally. She was fixing her sink. A movie? She had a dentist appointment. Finally, one night at a potluck she announced "I've got a free pair of concert tickets, anybody want to go?"

"I will!" I was too gaga to notice her trepidation. I tried to make a good impression in my vintage Hawaiian shirt, a poor choice for the chilly auditorium's metal seats. I scooted my chair toward her, hoping for some body heat. Was it my imagination, or did she scoot away? I scooted again. So did she. During the standing ovation I sidled closer. She stepped into the aisle.

It was pouring rain when the concert let out. We had to run across the parking lot to her truck. I hoped she'd put her warm arm around me or at least lay one of those pudgy little paws on my thigh. I wanted to connect, win her over, get in her pants. When a huge RV passed us I said, "Ah, that's my fantasy -- drive out to the boonies in a big camper and have loud sex."

Silence. She didn't say a word for the whole 45-minute drive home. I made myself wait a week to call her up. "Hi, I just harvested my potatoes. Want to come over for dinner?"

"Sure, that sounds exciting."

Potatoes? Exciting? This from the chair scooter? Maybe she finally ran out of excuses. Maybe she had a thing for spuds. We ate our baked potatoes. She was relaxed, warm, funny. Why hadn't I ever noticed those huge blue eyes?

"Another potato?" I asked.

After dinner, we took a walk, held hands, talked, laughed. We hugged good-night at my gate. Full body press. The next night we went to a GALA dance. We made out in the car and went home to my place. We shared a whole year of sleep-overs before I started using the word "Love." Even longer before "Forever" passed my lips. On our first six-month-a-versary, she gave me a card asking "Wanna try for another six months?" I hit the roof.

"Quit future tripping. Don't lay any expectations on me!"

The moment I changed is hard to pinpoint. Maybe it was when my old dog died and my sweetie stepped up to the number one loyal companion spot. Maybe it was weathering tough times without turning on each other that let me relax into love. Or maybe it just kept being good, so I stayed. After 14 years, even I will admit this isn't a fling. And the love keeps unfolding -- like one of those party-favor balls you unravel slowly so you don't miss any of the little prizes tucked between the layers. Who wouldn't want it to last forever?


Sally Sheklow has been a part of the Eugene community since 1972 and is a member of the WYMPROV! comedy troupe. Her column, which began at EW, also runs in several other newspapers around the country.

Back to Top


TREASURE CHEST
I am very perturbed by the data presented in the R-G article on Jan. 6 re: the PeaceHealth land acquisition along the McKenzie River. A few questions come to mind:

How did PeaceHealth amass such an enormous sum of money (about $1,000 for each man, woman and child in Lane County)? And how could they afford to sit on it awaiting the purchase of something that has so little to do with health care? Is there any other business or agency here so fortunate to have such an overflowing treasure chest? Could someone else have provided (or could they provide in the future) quality health care to this community for $350 million less, thereby freeing up that sum of money to be utilized within the local business community instead of retaining it in the "investment portfolio" of the "non-profit" corporation? And considering the casual manner in which the PeaceHealth officials justify the exorbitant prices they paid for their inappropriate parcel, why should we be confident that this entity can provide prudent planning for the future health care of this community?

Fred Felter
Eugene

 

WATCHDOGS WHISPERING
PeaceHealth overpaid for a few acres on the river?! How can that be? Those high-powered executives are all too smart to be taken by a convicted felon, aren't they?

If this were Chicago, civic watchdogs would be screaming the word "kickback." Politicians would be keeping quiet. Executives would be making no comment. The rubes would be declaring that they got a good deal. The people calling for investigation of executive bank accounts or looking for dummy corporations and hidden off-shore accounts would be getting ignored.

Good thing this is Eugene, the place where all the politicians are honest. Where city and county staff are bribe-proof. Where members of the hospital board of directors are super-intelligent and completely on top of things and have a firm, but loving hand of control over their executives. Where corporate executives would never take a kickback, even if it was in the millions. And it sure is a good thing we don't need to watch the activity of a few people's bank accounts.

It's a good thing that we can all rest assured knowing that PeaceHealth could never be ripped off by a convicted felon working in league with a corporate executive or two. That would be a moral outrage and we know such things don't happen around here.

Yep, good thing civic watchdogs around here are limited to whispering in shadows and to writing sarcastic letters to the editor.

Charlie Magee
Eugene

 

FLIP-FLOPPIN' MAD
If you are as disgusted as I am regarding Ann Morrison's recent decision to flip-flop on the issue of the proposed Eugene Sand & Gravel site, coming only after she met with the company's president, Mike Alltucker, please let her know how you feel. Her phone number is 682-4203 and her email address is anna.morrison@co.lane.or.us.

She is quoted as asking, "Do you really think someone could sway me one way or another? I'm a pretty strong person." Well, if one person can't sway her, maybe thousands can. (One can only speculate as to the motivation behind her recent change of heart, but the decision was probably easy because she lives at least 60 miles from the proposed site.)

While you're at it, if you haven't already voiced your opinion to Bobby Green and Cindy Weeldreyer, the other two commissioners who favor the site, they can be reached at the same phone number, and their e-mail addresses are: Bobby.Green@co.lane.or.us and Cindy.Weeldreyer@lane.k12.or.us

Eugene Sand & Gravel's definition of what constitutes "overburden" is absolutely ridiculous, and their failure to sample the ground accurately is totally irresponsible (EW, 1/3).

Don't let the greed of business interests destroy even more of our state's prime farm land.

Andy Bracco
Eugene

 

DIRTHEADS VS. JOHNSON
The Disciples of Dirt have rocks in their heads if they think James Johnston has no "sense of balance" or "trail riding ethics." They also accuse him of being a beginning mountain biker. Maybe they are just beginning conservationists. If they weren't, they would know that James is one of the most hard-working environmentalists in the country, not some newbee mountain biker.

Through the Cascadia Wildlands Project (POB 10455, Eugene 97440; 434-1463), James has worked to protect the last remaining ancient forests of the Cascades. CWP has many tangible victories in protecting wildlands in our area: stopping logging in the Warner Wilderness, protecting Cottage Grove's water supply by stopping logging in the Hardesty Mtn. roadless area, unrailing 60 million board feet of disastrous "repalcement volume" timber sales, etc.

The dirtheads simply just picked on the wrong guy. James is an avid conservationist, mountain biker, hiker and sportsman. They would know that if they looked up from the trail every now and again and paid attention to the forests around them.

Jim Flynn
Eugene

 

LOOKING FOR OUTRAGE
I applaud EW publishers not knuckling under to the self-proclaimed feminists whose protest tactics and whose arguments seem to come from the "OCA" handbook.

I abhor and have quite literally fought against abuse of women much of my life. I wholeheartedly support the basic feminist issues. But that feminists, Christians, politicians, etc., have the right to shove their personal views of what is proper sexual practice or impose censorship on things they don't like just doesn't fly.

As to that poor trembling woman abused by men (note the plural) who watched pornos, she might have considered after the first such experience to not socialize or have sex with such cads.

I didn't quite grasp the potential peril of dildos "in the hands of right-wing men." Are they OK with left-wing guys? Or how about middle-of-the-road lesbians?

I truly have come to believe there are people who live to find things to be outraged over. When any group of a few dozen "protesters" thinks they can dictate to the free press or that the community must conform to their ideals, they're not protesters, they're fanatics.

Tom Radabaugh
Springfield

 

EMERALD CITY SHINES
Impact Theatre's presentation of The Wizard of Oz at the McDonald Theatre was a step back to a time I have heard tell of from my elders. This young father took his two young munchkins off to see the wizard, where he realized upon arrival -- No cash! No ATM card! Argh! Armed with a solitary check, I was assured by the Impact's manager, "Its OK, I trust your face." And then I realized I was no longer in Kansas. What unfolded was an introduction from our own munchkin mayor who led the crowd in a few choruses, then our juggler extraordinaire captivated the little ones, then Betty Boop, oo boo be doopin', Buster Keaton, in all his synchronistic wonder, and a squirming, giggling, stage frightened costume show. Here's to the flying monkey!

Then as the sea of smiles lined up for cheap, (yes, cheap!) confections, I saw an old face in the crowd, greeted, smiled, shared a story, then back into the familiar ochre hue of the Oz's opening scenes. Upon return my littlest giggled as she got stuck in the seat, my eldest sung along to each song, and their eyes widened in silence as Dorothy awoke. At that moment, somewhere over a rainbow, this little Emerald City affirmed that if we have a heart, a brain, and da nuorve! we can become a community. Thanks to all of you for putting on a show, and see you on a Sunday.

Damien Sands
Eugene

 

THE REAL DEGRADATION
I must admit to being a little bemused at the recent back and forth in these pages regarding the efficacy of riding mountain bikes on the Goodman Creek Trail in the spectacular Hardesty Mountain trail system.

Yes, mountain bikes and hikers should avoid waterlogged trails, and yes, Hardesty Mountain is a world-class environmental jewel deserving of protection. But discussion of the real degradation of Hardesty has been glaringly absent.

Picture a wilderness trail taking you along a ridge-line replete with enormous old growth Douglas-fir and astonishing rock outcroppings. Then, imagine that this trail has been turned into a logging road leading straight into the heart of the wilderness. Furthermore, suppose that this road was built during the infamous salvage-rider of 1995 and thus was immune from all applicable environmental laws. Suppose that the logging company that built the road was given old growth trees as payment for destroying the trail via the "purchaser road credit" program while the Forest Service demanded $5 from you for the privilege of walking on the roadbed.

There are certainly many reasons to feel righteously indignant over the destruction of both the trails and forests of Hardesty, but I would humbly suggest that the best target for your wrath is the Forest Service.

Ranger Wayne Kleckner at the Cottage Grove Forest Service office will be happy to give you directions to the old Hardesty Way "trail" if you are interested in seeing it for yourself. He can be reached at 942-5591.

George Sexton
Eugene

 

KEEPING DISTANCE
Our basic concern is about the biological effects of low-intensity, non-thermal exposures to non-ionizing radiation. The Federal Communications Act of 1996 says that environmental concerns (i.e. health concerns) cannot be used as criteria in siting of cell phone (PCS) transmission towers. The FCC has established standards regarding Radio Frequency radiation. However, these standards only address the thermal affects of RF -- how long one can be within a certain range without being fried. There are no meaningful standards for long-term exposure to non-thermal, non-ionizing radiation. Credible studies are being done which point to DNA damage and change to the blood/brain barrier, etc.

When planning the infrastructure it takes to sustain the public's demand for cell phone coverage, we should err on the side of caution. These telecommunication facilities should be placed away from homes and schools. Off Franklin Boulevard, there very well could be two towers less than 900 feet from one another, near homes and schools (same thing on River Road).

Wake up Eugene and Lane County. For decades the tobacco industry touted their product as being safe. It took decades for the health ramifications to manifest themselves. This is a public health issue. The FCC is NOT looking out for us, city code is NOT being fully utilized to protect us, and the county doesn't even have an ordinance (yet!).

Mona Linstromberg
Veneta

 

TRUE EQUALITY?
Kari Johnson's article ("Herstory," 1/3) calls for an end to domestic violence against women, forgetting to mention that men also experience domestic violence -- from wives or domestic partners. Johnson thinks this problem will end if we allow women to make "the important decisions about our future." Shouldn't both sexes be making these decisions, since both are on this planet?

She wants humanity to degenerate to "a reality that we knew long ago; a reality that we can recreate." What reality is that? Johnson forgets that women too have historically been the aggressors of wars (e.g. Elizabeth I) or blood hungry goddesses that demanded human sacrifices (e.g. Kali). Women have suffered unjustly because of men, but we shouldn't digress to an age where we lived as animals and women died while giving birth. Such societies were ruled by their dark emotions: whim and its practical expression, force, without the temperance of knowledge, technology or the medical advancements of modern society.

Try telling an African housewife working through all of her waking hours with tools created before biblical times, who would die while giving birth under the care of her village witchdoctor, that America is defiled by expressways, supermarkets, and modern medicine.

Ms. Johnson, when you raise the flag for equal rights and an end to domestic violence, I will be the first person to stand with you. But if you raise the flag against technology and progress, I will be the first to stand against you.

Vicente Mejia
Eugene

 

NO FREE RIDE
I see panhandlers here in Eugene daily. They stand -- or sit-- with poorly scrawled signs that are hard to read, they watch as I pass. I feel they assume I'm better off than them, but I'm one step away from being homeless, too. Is it presumptuous to assume they're all really destitute and homeless? Or do they get into their car at the end of their "shift" and go home?

If so, then they're better off than me. I don't have a place to live, I don't have money for a place and I'm unemployed, too.

I have a roof over my head for a couple more weeks. I've been a live-in home care provider. I lost a kind elderly friend, my job and a place to live when he died.

It was a blessing to find someone with a nice house who needed me to live there. There are a lot of people in that situation, though, as our society works to keep our elders and handicapped out of nursing and care facilities. Those of us who need a place to live can earn our keep by moving in and helping out.

And what if it's not for you? Then for God's sake, at least DO something instead of just sitting or standing there. Sing! Dance! Recite poetry! Do magic! It's called singing for your supper, and we all have to do it.

There is no free ride. We all have to keep trying. Good luck to us all in the new year.

Marie McDonald
Eugene

 

GO TO THE SOURCE
Several of the 300-plus folks who attended the Nov. 27 Eugene forum on the military response in Afghanistan to the Sept. 11 attacks requested information sources from the speakers. The best site for current information, history and background is www.eurasianet.org It's operated by a nonprofit group of U.S. educators working to improve education in the region. For breaking news from an Afghani perspective, try www.sabawoon.com and for a feminist Afghani view of the Bonn agreement and the Northern Alliance, visit http://rawa.fancymarketing.net

The Nov. 27 Eugene forum at the Eugene First United Methodist Church was cosponsored by Community Alliance for Lane County (CALC), Lane Democratic Party, and the Middle East Peace Group. Organizers are working on a follow-up meeting this winter to continue to bring knowledgeable speakers into our community to explore avenues toward sustainable national security. We hope to raise the level of the discussion and carry our message to our elected representatives in Washington. Co-sponsors are welcome. For information, call CALC at 485-1755.

Fergus McLean
Dexter

 

SWAT TERRORISTS
Homegrown terrorists. They attack the citizens of Lane County, including children. They are called SWAT. Like Bin Laden and al Qaeda they use the media such as the Red Guard for their propaganda, and like the Taliban, the Eugene police deny they have done any wrong, and like bin Laden and al Qaeda they ask the people to support their cause and pay for better equipment. Do not support terrorists such as SWAT and their protectors.

If this is printed, I fully understand like the family in Creswell, cell groups such as the Cottage Grove Police and Creswell Sheriff will probably follow me, park beside me, and possibly spotlight my home just as they did to that family, after the people's press, AKA: Eugene Weekly, told their story in May.

J. Secerd
Cottage Grove

 

SEX EDUCATION
If we are going to roast a decent and sensitive editor over the radio-coals for the ills of pornography (which, in my opinion, radiate the ills that are in society and in ourselves) than I'm going to quote Nancy Friday to draw their fire:

"In my books on women's sexual fantasies, the single greatest theme that emerges was that of 'weak' women being sexually dominated, 'forced' by male strength to do this deliciously awful thing.... On the surface, this would seem to be a perfect illustration of the symmetry of desire between the sexes. If women daydream of being overpowered into sex, isn't this desire mirrored in the male fantasy of sexual dominance -- the demanding brute who can never get enough women? The answer is no."

I'm not saying rape isn't a crime against humanity which men almost always perpetrate. But most men don't want to rape, and, as Friday shows, don't even want to dominate. Friday makes a good case that our sexual passions relate to how women and men are raised and taught about sex. Let's talk about that too if we are going to blame genders.

Vincent Reynolds
Eugene

 

VOLVOS FOR PEACE
I've read many statements attacking SUVs with American flags lately. At least they can face and admit their fossil fuel addiction. I don't agree with driving huge SUVs, but more disturbing is the proliferation of Volvos blindly calling for peace with their globe fliers. These folks need to come out of denial and realize the link their way of life has on global intervention their demand locks our country into.

Also, will the EW please do a front page issue on our local cell tower mess? With Cricket Wireless scheming to put 18 to 24 towers near our local schools, all people in our area should be given and opportunity to think about how it affects them. Other major publications in town have put this issue front and center. A thorough and interesting article appeared in the R-G Nov. 24. Please look it up if you missed it.

Zachary Vishanoff
Eugene

Back to Top



Table of Contents | News | Views | Arts & Entertainment
Classifieds | Personals | EW Archive