|
Insider
Baseball: Corporate Candy: Tax breaks for wealthy
corporations work through Legislature.
Natural
Resistance: Sleeping Over: Wake up surrounded
by your oldest relatives.
Living
Out: Rx for IT: We have miracle drugs for every
other unmentionable ailment.
Letters:
EW readers sound off.
Corporate
Candy
Tax
breaks for wealthy corporations work through Legislature.
Labor notes. SB485,
the omnibus workers' comp bill seemed stalled, but now a compromise
has been worked out to deal with the Supreme Court decision in Smothers:
Workers can sue if they are injured at work and have unsuccessfully
filed through the workers' comp system first.
Some labor folks feel that the compromise will be challenged
in court until the language regarding "major contributing factor"
reverts to the previous standard of "material" factor. The theory
is that employer premiums will increase somewhere in the range of
1.5 percent to 4 percent as more workers' injuries are accepted into
the system. This will obviously be an issue for the 2003 session of
the Oregon Legislature; why should next session be any different than
the last 70?
SB 67, the capital gains
tax cut, where Oregon's wealthiest 1 percent got 50 percent
of the tax break, passed by 16 votes, the bare minimum. A couple of
Democrats voted for it, but the governor has been pretty clear about
his veto. Two other corporate tax breaks, the pollution control credits
and the single-factor corporate income tax, are still in play. These
breaks further erode the budgets in the next two biennia; but the
governor, the speaker, the Senate president and the two co-chairs
of Ways and Means are lame ducks, so their collective minds may be
on more immediate concerns like a formulary and an OSU campus in Bend.
SB 134, the bad PERS bill, also passed on the Senate
floor with 16 votes. Three Republicans voted against it and three
Democrats voted for it -- damndest thing I've seen all session.
Vern Duncan really showed some guts, John Minnis voted from the heart
and Wally Miller, well, Wally was being Wally. Two of the Democrats,
on the other hand, flip-flopped like coho on concrete, and landed
on the wrong side after telling the unions they were with them. I
don't think anything pisses me off more in this process than waffling
on important issues -- unless it's deal-making outside your caucus.
The governor was oddly silent on the bill, claiming
he doesn't send veto letters or "letters of concern" until bills have
passed successfully from one chamber to the next.
From the We Hate Government
Sorta Society: The drought in the Klamath Basin has registered
in the Capitol. We're given reports of food handouts and of meetings
with the feds to get an emergency bailout -- have the government
buy the dry land for the $4,000 an acre it was worth before the drought.
We even had one of our esteemed colleagues from down south come to
our caucus with hat in hand. After 'splaining to us that Klamath County
residents would just as soon see the state of Oregon disappear at
its borders, our conservative brother asked us for some General Fund
dollars -- $2.2 million -- to dig some wells down there.
Now I believe in the pre-capitalist notion of the
"commons," that as a society we can share certain resources for the
benefit of all. And it's true that government's role is to protect
people from the tyranny of the majority and to help folks in need.
So I'm not having any problem coming up with money for those folks
down there, I'll probably vote to do so. But it's no small irony that
the senator requesting the funds is the same guy who accompanied Bill
Sizemore to our Senate Revenue Committee months earlier with a proposal
to cut another $800 million from our General Fund. His bill would
have done what Measure 91 failed to do: allow the total deduction
of federal taxes from state taxes. And it was the same guy who, as
majority leader in the House last session, led the charge on a referral
out of the Legislature that became Measure 88, which raised the federal
deduction from $3,000 to $5,000. Our General Fund is $166 million
short this biennium thanks to that little puppy. And remember, the
Republican leadership sent that out as a referral because, guess what,
the governor can't veto referrals!
So, sure, we'll find the $2.2 million. But it will
be at the expense of another program for Oregon's poorest or most
at-risk. That much you can count on.
Tony Corcoran of Cottage Grove is minority whip in the Senate
and represents portions of Lane and Douglas counties in Senate District
22. He can be reached in Salem at (503) 986-1722 or e-mail corcoran.sen@state.or.us
Back to Top
Sleeping
Over
Wake
up surrounded by your oldest relatives.
As we near high noon of our four seasons, here's an
invitation: choose a day to go outdoors. Meaning,
don't ever go indoors for 24 hours, not even into a tent (unless it's
raining). Consider it a visit to some of your oldest relations --
your tree relatives, bird relatives, rock relatives, lizard relatives.
Go sleep near them; wake up to them.
Age is not a problem. I remember an 85-year-old man
I met on a Sierra Nevada trail. He was backpacking alone for the week,
thrilled. He had hiked there for 50 years. "I hate to think of the
summer I won't be walking through these mountains," he said. His eyes
glistened.
Earlier I had met a group of 10 on the trail --
a mix of old to very young. With occasional additions of little ones,
this group had hiked together for a week each of 26 summers. This
year they had hired a packer to take some of their gear to "base camp."
Of course there is the option of car camping for your
24-hour foray outdoors. But remember this: Packing in doesn't require
marathon distances. Often you can walk a mile and find a site as special
as 25 miles further in.
I thought about all this recently as I strolled four
days down southern Oregon's Rogue River Trail with my partner, O'B.
Each day was an infinite gift. Here are journal notes from the first
day:
April 12. We start from Graves Creek after lunch.
Gray day -- the river is green, alternately silence and rapids.
The first two miles are carpets of flowers: yellow tidy-tips, pink
valerian, dark purple larkspur, white popcorn flower, leggy buttercup,
Indian paintbrush, shooting stars, a nodding red lily with yellow
spots inside. The maples are starting to leaf out.
While we rest at Whiskey Creek (three miles), two
Canada geese families float by, one with six, the other with seven
yellow-fluff goslings. They climb the opposite shore to preen and
feed. One mom sits down; her seven babies crowd around and disappear
under her wings. Occasionally one or two yellow fluff-balls squeeze
out front from under her wing; they turn right around and climb back
in. Dad goose stands by on one foot.
Now mom #2 sits down, and her six babies come to her
side, but she doesn't lift her wings to take them in. Hmmm. They huddle
near her in the cold.
On and off sprinkles of rain. Smooth madrone tree
trunks: sensuous pale pink with hints of pale green and grey.
Camp is one-third mile below Russian River in a small
patch of sand. Initially our site looks uninviting: rocky, haphazard
vegetation, wet pools. But once I start walking around, everything
is stunning: an old milkweed; grasses -- big bunches, spidery
little ones; sedges -- a giant sedge, some neat, black cigar-head
sedges; mustards -- big yellow ones, little white ones; a miner's
lettuce looking like a Fourth of July firecracker; buckwheats; a leggy
grape, its leaf bundles looking like baby pink roses; mosses --
wet and brilliant orange and green.
And rocks. One to photograph in the morning: nondescript
gray with lichen, except for a pothole looking like pink folds of
cloth -- as if the rock has a soft inside.
Frogs are calling along the edge of the river ...
Through what city could you walk six miles and never
see anything but beauty?
The next three days flowed by like a long, linear
tale: a Western pond turtle trudging up-slope, 200 feet from its river,
to find an egg-laying site; a red-tailed hawk screaming alarm at a
falcon; a sandy camp among heavy, dark, jointed boulders, warmed by
afternoon sun.
Ultimately, of course, this is the home from whence
we came, and sometimes we know that in our bones. "I only went out
for a walk," John Muir once wrote of his life, "and finally concluded
to stay out till sundown, for going out, I found, was really coming
in."
Try it. Stay with night as it rises and be there for
dawn's descent. Our earth can always use a few more intimate friends.
Back to Top
Rx
for IT
We have
miracle drugs for every other unmentionalble ailment.
So many amazing medicines grace our pharmacy shelves,
why don't we have an antidote to homophobia?
That tired old condition afflicts millions and annoys the hell out
of the rest of us. Activists are at wits' end. We've got to find a
remedy.
Maybe we should hand this one over to the big pharmaceutical
corporations. They've come up with miracle drugs for every other unmentionable
ailment. Notice how nobody experiences impotence anymore? Drug companies
renamed it "erectile dysfunction," brought it out of the bedroom,
and gave it friendly, easy-to-pronounce initials -- ED. To treat
ED they brought us Viagra, along with its very own celebrity spokesperson
-- Mr. ED. Viagra's advertising blitz convinced men that talking
to the doctor about ED is an act of courage.
Turns out the market is chock full of courageous men.
Now, why can't they do the same for homophobia? Pharmaceutical geniuses
persuade multitudes to seek help for the heartbreak of other disorders
just by renaming them. Supermarket sales skyrocketed as soon as we
knew we could get relief from the lack of feminine freshness.
Once drug companies recognize the profit potential
of combating homophobia, they're sure to come up with a new name for
it, a product to treat it and an ad campaign to get people to
ask their doctors for it. But first they'll have to bring the disorder
out of the closet. Get folks to recognize that being homophobic is
at least as shameful and personally offensive as dandruff, unsightly
facial hair and dishwasher spots on your stemware.
Naturally, they'll have to test-market names for the
condition to find one that will sell. Candidates might be HQ (Hate
Queers), or CHAD (Can't Handle Actual Differences), or GPDLMSTOTBO
(God, Please, Don't Let My Son Turn Out to be One). Execs will push
for their favorite runners up: Bias Anxiety Disorder (BAD) and General
Repetitive Rudeness (GRR).
But it's got to be something really simple and catchy,
something homophobes won't be afraid to take a pill for. A normal
name. Amidst cheers of corporate camaraderie they'll unveil it.
Ladies and gentlemen: Inhibited Tolerance (IT).
Convincing people that IT is even a problem
will be a formidable advertising task, because one symptom of IT is
that nobody wants to admit they have IT. But the pharmaceutical
industry has overcome much bigger challenges; surely they can tackle
IT. They can launch an awareness campaign and distribute cute little
refrigerator magnets listing the warning signs of IT:
-- You've been telling the same fag joke since high
school and still think it's funny.
-- Anti-gay petitioners know you by name.
-- Rainbows give you the creeps.
-- "Guess what, Mom?" makes you cringe.
-- Nobody invited you to an Ellen party.
Now let the mass marketing begin. Clinical descriptions
of IT will blitz magazine ads and TV commercials. "Do you have trouble
enjoying people of diverse orientations? Do you deride,
devalue or deny the rights of sexual minorities? Do you ever use the
insult 'That's so gay!'? You may suffer from Inhibited Tolerance.
You're not alone. Millions of Americans like you have IT. But there's
good news. Now you can get HELP -- Happily Embrace Life's Plurality.
Ask your doctor if HELP is right for you." (Warning: May cause loosening
of rigidity, the uncontrollable urge to embrace banished family members
and a change in voting habits.)
Some sort of status will have to be associated with
admitting Inhibited Tolerance and asking for HELP. Drug companies
will need someone who can do for IT what Bob Dole did for ED. A familiar
celebrity spokesperson who's been around long enough to be the voice
of experience. A trusted voice from Washington's hallowed halls.
"Hi, I'm Jesse Helms. I never even realized I had
IT until my lesbian great-granddaughter took me aside and told me.
(Jesse smiles and puts his arm around a strapping young dyke.) Then
I found HELP."
Sally Sheklow has been a part of the Eugene community since 1972
and is a member of the WYMPROV! comedy troupe. Her column, which began at EW,
also runs in several other newspapers around the country.
Back to Top
EVERYONE'S
GUILTY
The fact that Jeff Luers ("22 at
22," 6/14) did not physically harm anyone when he set fire to the
Romania truck lot does not exclude him from deserved punishment or
censure. He did, in fact, hurt the owners of the lots, whose only
guilt was to participate in the free market system. Everyone in this
country is guilty then, including Luers. Did he produce or hand make
those milk jugs, sponges and matches that he used to destroy the property
of others?
This wanton destruction of private property only reiterates
that activists like Luers are immature and irresponsible. Instead
of attempting to change the world through positive action, they break
the law, wound others, and then whine when they are caught. It is
quite facile: If you break the law, you forfeit certain rights and
you are subject to punishment. Simply because some do not believe
in governmental authority doesn't mean that they are not restrained
by the same laws that govern the rest of us. In the United States,
if one does not like a law, one is invited to participate in government
at any level to change it. As a citizen one can also introduce new
measures for the yea or nay of fellow citizens. Luers' use of any
of these things could have brought positive action and change to the
state, the country and the world. I, too, support stricter emissions
standards and the use of alternative energy sources. However, I don't
condone violence, and that is the method Luers chose.
I'm hardly surprised that the Eugene Weekly
is again irresponsibly condoning violence and sympathizing with a
user of violence, but I can use my voice to speak out in a way that
harms no one.
Emily Gould
Eugene
EDITOR'S NOTE: For the record, EW has never condoned
violence, but we do condone apolitical and non-selective prosecution
of law-breakers.
WHERE'S THE ACLU?
The remarks of the attorney who worked
for the Lane County DA's office that were quoted in Cheri Brooks'
(6/14) article "22 at 22" alarmed me greatly. I'm not even slightly
surprised that the DA's office has a policy for treating the anarchists
differently from the rest of the population, but I didn't know that
such clear evidence of the policy existed. This is most obviously
a violation of individuals' First Amendment rights, and is clearly
persecution (and prosecution) because of political beliefs. Where
is the ACLU in these cases?
I strongly respect the aforementioned attorney's right
to not have his name published in the newspaper, but he possesses
evidence of probable illegal discrimination by one of the leading
legal authorities in this county. I believe both he and the ACLU have
an obligation to hold the DA and his office accountable for their
actions.
Perhaps there is a pending suit of which I am unaware;
if so, it seems that a goodly amount of public awareness could be
raised by publicizing the issues surrounding such an action. The
Register Guard is considered by many to be a lost cause when it
comes to publishing anything that doesn't match its agenda, but there
are still quite a number of independent media that value free expression.
It is clear the government and the powers of the "free
market" have no interest in stopping this undermining of the quality
of life on this planet; and that leaves just you and me. Please, for
all our sakes, speak out and take action now, before we have slipped
too far.
Craig T. Miller
Eugene
ZERO SYMPATHY
I have zero sympathy for Jeffrey
Luers. If you intentionally burn somebody else's property, for whatever
reason, you should be headed to jail. There are plenty of victims
of Measure 11 (which I oppose) to write about. Mr. Luers seems to
deserve coverage because he committed an act of "eco-terrorism." Why
should I give a damn about Mr. Luers, who acted intentionally, while
a good friend of mine is in prison for six years because of an unintentional
act? Should I care because Mr. Luers is an "environmentalist?" In
that case, since I vehemently oppose the goals and methods of environmentalists
like Mr. Luers, is it OK if I burn down his house or Eugene Weekly
offices? Of course not. If you commit an intentional act of destruction
you'd better be ready to do the time. Quit whining about political
repression and other nonsense. Or better yet, avoid burning other
people's stuff.
Peter Wilson
Corvallis
THE REALITY OF RACE
The ideal of color blindness as suggested
by Wes Wightman (6/7) evokes a feeling of strangulation as I consider
that this is the trend of today's white consciousness around issues
of race. Many feel that the "ugly past" is irrelevant to where Eugene
is today and yet it is that very past that has brought us to this
politically correct, majority thinking, white ideal that colorblindness
is the appropriate response. At one point we physically and lawfully
excluded persons of color from our communities. Now we, in the name
of "cultural sensitivity," insist that we do not see color ridding
us of the responsibility in addressing issues of power between white
majority and minority populations.
The white community has decided that racism is only
about hate crimes and whether or not to allow persons of color into
their homes and businesses. The fact that this determination comes
from the community of most privilege and not from the voices of color
is a reflection of the silencing that minority populations continue
to experience and the lack of acknowledgement from the white community
that the face of racism today has taken on much more subtle characteristics.
The reality of racism can only change when those in power begin to
listen to the history and the present day experiences of minority
groups and allow for these perceptions to change attitudes and practices
in our businesses, schools, homes and community.
It is time that the white majority community stopped
turning a blind eye to color and faced the reality of race in this
community!
Jhorna Hochstedler
Eugene
FURIOUS
I just wanted to express my disgust
at the recent (5/31) article written by Alan Pittman, "Ye Old Sprawling
Honky Town." I am from Scottish descent and have been called "honky"
several times before, many times from blacks and other non-whites
whom your Mr. Pittman has not seen an abundance of locally. Why is
this even an issue here in Eugene? Would it be fair then to write
an article in Oakland, Calif., titled "Ye Old Sprawling Nigger Town"?
Or San Ysidro as "Ye Old Sprawling Beaner Town"? How far do you think
that one would go?
It is my assumption that we all would like to be treated
as equals and for the most part we are (except when it comes to minority
preference at colleges etc., but I won't get into that). Anyway, I
as well as several of my colleagues are furious with the verbiage
of that article. If you want to help, try not being too colorful and
tactless when it comes to race.
Howard L. Hicks
Eugene
WEIGHING THE LAW
We Americans pride ourselves on living
in a country run by the rule of law. But what do we do when our laws
become oppressive rather than helpful? The obvious answer is the ballot
box. We elect new representatives who will (hopefully) change or abolish
unfair and oppressive laws. But somehow this rarely happens. Instead,
the laws pile higher and higher, year after year.
Is there no hope for the thousands of families plunged
into despair when the iron fist of the state clubs a family member
into submission for an act that should never have been considered
criminal in the first place, or an act that, given the special circumstances,
is perfectly justified? Yes, there is something we can do.
Most citizens don't realize that if they are called
to serve on a jury, they not only have the power to judge guilt or
innocence, but the validity of the particular law itself. That's right,
a jury member can decide to acquit a defendant of the "crime" he or
she is accused of even if all the evidence supports a conviction if
the juror feels the law is superfluous or unfair, in general, or in
this particular case.
The "legal community" -- judges and prosecutors
particularly -- don't want you to know this because it complicates
their job. But you do have the right to refuse to convict. Point your
browser to your favorite search engine and type the words "jury nullification."
You won't believe how much information pops up.
Rick Marcus
Eugene
UNEARNED PRIVILEGE
While some of us sit around and complain
about the use of a "highly offensive racial epithet" (6/14) in a newspaper,
we can also put that newspaper down and go back to the real world,
where white people like me experience real privileges we never earned.
For example, I never have to represent my entire race
when asked, "What do white people think about this?" No one looked
at me in college and thought "athletic scholarship" instead of intelligent.
I can hold any high-ranking job without anyone whispering about affirmative
anything getting me there instead of skill. And I can be a total idiot
asshole in public without worrying anyone will attribute what I say
or do to all white people.
I must admit that I'm a tiny bit pleased about some
people gaining a little understanding into what it might feel like
to be oppressed. I don't condone the use of any epithets, yet perhaps
those offended about the article can use that anger effectively (rather
than just write a letter) and channel it into working for equality.
Learn for yourself and help teach our city's youth what we all need
to know.
Kent McIntosh
Eugene
TRUE COSTS
The decision of Sacred Heart to move its
hospital and some other medical services to the far northeast corner
of Eugene was announced as being the most cost-effective way to expand
its facilities. This argument may be credible if one looks only at
Sacred Heart's immediate costs of land acquisition, construction and
relocation compared to expanding at the present sites. But unmentioned
are other real costs to the city, county, taxpayers and patients.
Who will pay for the infrastructure improvements necessitated by relocation,
including adequate parking, road widening, and the possible re-building
of the Beltline-Coburg Road interchange, now often at capacity? These
would be some of the major one-time expenditures.
More significant, perhaps, would be the ongoing costs:
the added expense of greatly increased bus service (LTD now provides
frequent service to Sacred Heart on East 13th); the additional time
it would require for most patients to reach the new facility; exacerbated
traffic problems in the Crescent-Chad-Coburg Road area; and the effect
of increased pollution from the added vehicular traffic.
There is in Portland an instructive example of two
large medical facilities -- Emmanuel and Good Samaritan --
both of which have, over many years, expanded with great success (and
accessibility) at their original inner-city locations. I can't help
wondering if anyone here is actually looking at the true costs, over
the next two to three decades, of the announced relocation. If these
true costs are considered against the claimed advantages, not just
to Sacred Heart's health-care business but to the entire Eugene-Springfield
community, the net result can only be seen, I think, as far from beneficial.
Douglas Leedy
Eugene
ANIMAL HOUSE
In an area the size of Lane County,
it is unconscionable to have inadequate county animal care facilities
(Lane County Animal Regulation Authority).
There are too few kennels for dogs, not enough cages
for cats, and too few employees to deal with the animals. Nearly 400
adoptable dogs and over a 1,000 adoptable cats were killed last year
alone because of lack of kennel/cage space at the Lane County Animal
Facilities. A heartbreaking situation.
All three of my cats were adopted from shelters, it
was mere luck that I stopped by on that one particular day to adopt
a cat, the next day would have been too late. Without enough kennel
or cage space to house adoptable animals most of the wonderful, loving
animals that are brought in, have to be euthanized.
Presently the Lane County Commissioners are working
on securing adequate funding for the Lane County Animal Facilities.
It's a win-win situation. The animals get adequate space, a second
chance to become someone's best friend, and Lane County gets a bigger
animal facility with increased personnel (more jobs). This local increased
local funding would also signal grant givers that Lane County is committed
to providing responsible care for its homeless animals. Once the local
funding is brought up to adequate levels, animal welfare grant money
would pour into the area to help Lane County establish a modern animal
care facility.
Please let your Lane County Commissioners know that
you agree with increased funding for Lane County Animal Regulation
Authority. It's desperately needed.
Sue Mandeville
Springfield
BAD WORD
A comment on your "Census in Eugene"
article (5/31): "honky" is an opprobious term to describe whites.
Is it any less offensive than "nigger" to describe blacks?
Jim Estes
Deadwood
NON-UNION
ACTORS
If you're planning to buy tickets
to the Broadway Nights series at the Hult center, there are a few
things you should know. First, the group that brings us this series
calls themselves the Theatre League of Eugene. They are, however,
a booking office in Salt Lake City, Utah and are called the Theatre
League of (fill in the blank) depending on what city the show is in.
Profits from the tickets you buy go to this booking office and the
New York producer, but do not stay in Eugene.
Also, these "professional" shows come to us with top-notch
sets, lights, costumes and music, but the actors are non-union (This
year, Les Miserables is the only union show in the Broadway
Nights series). This usually means that the actors are fairly new
to the profession. As a matter of fact, some of our local actors have
had more professional experience than many of the actors sent to us
in these high priced road shows. An important point is that Actors
Equity Association (the stage actors union, and an affiliate of the
AFL-CIO) has been trying to negotiate with these producers to allow
union (more experienced) actors to travel with these shows. The producers
claim they can't afford to do that. So, everyone associated with these
road shows is making industry standard, except the people on stage,
acting and singing and working their hearts out.
They are making $50 per show with no health insurance.
So, for anyone looking for ways to spend their entertainment dollars,
please consider the above as you decide, and maybe a local show, at
half the price, will be more appealing.
Carol Horne
Eugene
RETHINK CHAIN STORES
Re: Home Depot. The introduction
of big box chain stores into communities in order to create sources
of income is termed, in economic circles, the fiscalization of the
land. In the long term, this can only have a negative effect on local
economies. The profits at these stores are not recirculated within
the community, but sent to corporate headquarters that are typically
out of town.
From interviews with employees of Home Depots in other
cities, it was learned that these stores provide only part-time jobs,
averaging 28 hours per week, which they consider to be full-time positions,
starting at minimum wage. These part-time positions replace 1 1/2
full-time positions of those previously employed by the locally owned
businesses that have been forced to close.
The pricing of these chain stores is predatory, which
causes locally owned stores to fail, and once the competition has
been eliminated the chain stores raise their prices to levels that
are no longer a bargain. Also, it was learned from owners of locally
owned hardware stores in other cities that the leading brand manufacturers
of tools, etc., provide the chain stores with free merchandise in
order to promote their product lines, so the chain stores can further
undercut the pricing of locally owned businesses.
These predatory business practices also affect the
wholesalers who sell to local stores, so the negative consequences
have a broad ripple effect. Those making the decisions regarding the
introduction of the big box chain stores need to consider the consequences
of creating false economies, which can erode of the very foundations
of communities.
Pauline Hutson
Eugene
MAJOR FRAUD
Thanks in part to our own Sen. Ron
Wyden, there is increasing evidence that petroleum companies conspired
to deliberately limit refining capacity in order to both increase
their already-bloated profit margins as well as encourage the restriction,
if not outright elimination, of certain environmental laws. If true,
this is major, major fraud, pure and simple.
But if indeed somewhere down the road these accusations
are found to be true -- how many CEOs does anyone honestly think
will be put in jail, real jail, not those country clubs in which the
likes of Michael Milken end up?
Bill Smee
Eugene
LETTERS POLICY: We welcome letters on all topics and will print
as many as space allows. Please limit length to 250 words, keep submissions to once
a month, and include your address and phone number. E-mail to editor@eugeneweekly.com, fax to 484-4044, or mail
to 1251 Lincoln, Eugene 97401.
Back to Top
Table
of Contents
| News
| Views
| Arts
& Entertainment
Classifieds | Personals
|
EW
Archive
|